Bytte Strømleverandør | Hvordan få Forbrukslån | Advokater | Husforsikring | Brannalarm | Innbruddsalarm | Forbrukernet

Latest News

Cassie and Molly’s Law gets first hour of debate

By | Cassie and Molly's Law, Home, News | No Comments


For Immediate Release

Today debate began on Cassie and Molly’s Law in the House of Commons

Ottawa – May 2, 2016 – Members of the House of Commons began debate today on Cassie and Molly’s Law, a bill tabled by M.P. Cathay Wagantall (Yorkton-Melville) to protect pregnant women and their future families.

This bill adds new sentences for criminals who knowingly harm a pregnant women and her fetus. Cassie and Molly’s Law also enforces pregnancy as an aggravating factor for the purposes of sentencing.

In her opening speech, Wagantall said “It is my sincere hope that we can put partisanship aside. I am asking all my Colleagues to listen to their consciences, and to listen to everyday Canadians who instinctively know that it is simply wrong to violate a woman’s pregnancy and cause the death of her yet-to-be-born child.”

Wagantall added, “As legislators we must hold to our responsibility to protect the innocent with sound reasoning combined with compassionate and caring instincts.”

Wagantall continued, “I want to reinforce that these new offences are not stand-alone offences. The new offences in Cassie and Molly’s Law address only situations where a violent criminal harms or kills a woman’s preborn child. In these cases judges must consider the pregnancy of women as an aggravating factor during sentencing.”

 – 30 –

Bill C-246, Modernizing Animal Protections Act

By | Featured, Home, News | No Comments

What you need to know about Bill C-246, Modernizing Animal Protections Act.

This Vegan Liberal MP Has Pissed Off Canada’s Outdoorsmen with a New Animal Rights Bill (By Remi L. Roy | Vice Canada | April 14, 2016)

Radio interview with Phil Morlock/Shimano Canada:

The bill:

Legal analysis of Bill C-246:

MP Robert Sopuck on Bill C-246:

Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) – Op-ed by MP Harold Albrecht

By | Featured, Home, News | No Comments

When I learned that I would be sitting as an alternate member of the committee created to study Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) I immediately felt the full weight of the responsibility that has been given to me as I serve the constituents of Kitchener-Conestoga for a fourth term.

Let me say at the outset that I do not support PAS in any shape or form. Each of us has a worldview shaped and influenced by many factors. My worldview is shaped by my family experiences, my education, opportunities to serve in my community, opportunities to observe many cultures, and is most profoundly shaped by my faith. I believe that every human life has intrinsic dignity and value, regardless of perceived disability or deformity or of perceptions of being “a burden”. So I cannot support any legislation that the government puts forward that will in any way devalue human life.

That being said, the Supreme Court of Canada has determined that the Government must change the criminal code in order to allow for PAS in Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada has done this completely rejecting the fact that the elected members of the House of Commons have rejected initiatives to legalize PAS on at least 15 occasions since 1991. Most recently, a bill to allow PAS was rejected in 2010 by a vote of 59-226. It is not the job of the Supreme Court to create laws but rather to interpret them.

It is my view, that with the unrealistically short time-frame given to create legislation to properly protect our most vulnerable, the Government should have implemented the notwithstanding clause, which would have given parliament five years to craft proper legislation, rather than rush forward with a very weak and permissive regime which will not adequately protect our most vulnerable citizens.

The trial judge of Carter made a point to say that there must be “stringent limits that are scrupulously monitored and enforced”. It is now very clear that the Liberal dominated committee report to the government fails to do this! In its one-sided, overly permissive report – which will endanger lives of vulnerable Canadians, there is a lack of any meaningful safeguards. Risks are too great to allow this weak system to be implemented.

In Canada we no longer practice Capital Punishment. The risk of killing one innocent person by way of capital punishment is far too great and I believe that this same principle should apply in the case of PAS.

We can learn from other jurisdictions which have allowed PAS for a period of time. Even with so-called “safeguards”, Belgium has seen a great degree of “mission creep” as the number of cases of PAS has increased dramatically. In Belgium PAS has been legal for over a decade. In 2003 there were 347 cases; in 2015 there were over 2000 cases. Canada’s population is approximately 3 times larger than Belgium, so it’s not inconceivable that we could see up to 6000 cases of PAS in Canada per year. This would be national tragedy!

We as legislators should be doing everything we can to make sure that not one single person dies needlessly. It is with this in mind that I put forward the following, common sense recommendations that I believe will do a far better job at protecting the vulnerable in Canada:

  1. Only Canadian Citizens or Permanent Residents that are over the age of 18 may be able to access Physician Assisted Suicide.
  2. In order to protect against coercion by Doctors, only the patient can initiate a conversation about Physician Assisted Suicide.
  3. In order to make a fully informed decision, quality palliative care must be offered and made readily available for all those considering Physician Assisted Suicide.
  4. The person must be terminally ill in order to access Physician Assisted Suicide.
  5. Persons who request that have a history of Mental Illness must be assessed by a psychiatrist in order to fully assess whether the decision is being made competently and with clear understanding.
  6. There is at least one independent witness at the formal request for Physician Assisted Suicide.
  7. A period of waiting be given that is relative to the prognosis between request of Physician Assisted Suicide and when it is administered.
  8. Advanced directives may not be allowed due to the risk that even one person may be Euthanized who otherwise would have changed their mind.
  9. Doctors receive proper training in administering the means of Physician Assisted Suicide and acquire a special license allowing them to administer lethal drugs.
  10. Doctors and Hospitals may not be forced against their conscience to provide or directly refer Physician Assisted Suicide.
  11. A non-physician adjudicating body carry out a prior review in order to assess legality of request and evaluate vulnerability concerns.
  12. Finally, that this legislation be periodically reviewed by Parliament thoroughly analyzing the data collected by the Provincial and Territorial Health departments – allowing for amendments if misuses arise.

I offer these “safeguards” while remaining opposed to PAD. Recognizing that the government of Canada is intent on allowing for PAD — at a minimum I believe that these recommendations must be included if we truly care about the protection of vulnerable Canadians.

Petition to protect vulnerable Canadians from Physician Assisted Suicide
PAS Petition final (PDF – print & mail, no postage necessary)

Harold Albrecht,
MP Kitchener-Conestoga

April 14, 2016

Bill C-246, Modernizing Animal Protections Act

March 11, 2016

Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) – Op-ed by MP Harold Albrecht

Teachers Institute on Canadian Parliamentary Democracy

REMINDER: 30 April is the deadline for applications


Outreach for Vimy Ridge Day

Remembering the battle for Vimy Ridge…


Canada 150: Join the Celebration!

In 2017 Canada will mark the 150th anniversary of Confederation. This is your celebration! How will you join Canadians taking part from coast to coast to coast? The Canada 150 adventure awaits you.

Learn More

Veterans Ombudsman’s Commendation

Any individual, group, business or organization that has made an exceptional contribution to the well-being of Veterans and their families can be nominated for the Veterans Ombudsman’s Commendation.

Learn More

The New Horizons for Seniors Program

The New Horizons for Seniors Program is a federal Grants and Contributions program that supports projects led or inspired by seniors who make a difference in the lives of others and in their communities.

Learn More

Stay Connected


I am concerned the Liberal government plans to add a new tax on the payroll of Canadians for a CPP increase that will do nothing for seniors that need more help today. ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

Today is National Aboriginal Day. I believe it is important we take a moment to learn more about indigenous communities in Canada. In Yorkton-Melville I have been priviledged with visiting and speaking with indigenous students. ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook